Better AI risk management

Hi ,

Elon Musk's Grok just restricted its image generation feature.

Only paying subscribers can create images now after widespread outcry over sexualized AI imagery.

The UK threatened to ban X completely. Prime Minister Keir Starmer called the content "disgraceful" and "disgusting."

Ofcom has power to block X in the UK and fine up to 10% of global turnover.

This is what happens when AI tools launch without safeguards.

But first, today's testing framework and marketing reality check (then see what Grok's restrictions mean for AI regulation...)

🔥 Prompt of the Day 🔥

Creative Testing Priority Matrix

Create one "What to Test First" decision framework.

Act as a creative strategist. Create one testing prioritization system for [AD CAMPAIGNS] that focuses budget on highest-impact tests.

Essential Details:

Available Test Budget: [WEEKLY SPEND] Creative Elements: [HOOKS/IMAGES/CTA/FORMATS] Current Performance: [BASELINE METRICS] Past Test Results: [WHAT YOU'VE LEARNED] Client Risk Tolerance: [CONSERVATIVE/AGGRESSIVE] Testing Velocity: [HOW FAST YOU CAN TEST]

Create one priority matrix including:

Impact potential scoring (high/medium/low) Effort required assessment Test difficulty rating Statistical significance timeline Budget allocation per test type Sequential testing roadmap "Test this first" recommendation

Test smart, not random.

💡 Marketing Monday 💡

Trend Timing Failures

Jumping on trends three weeks late looks desperate.

By the time everyone's doing it, it's done.

Speed and relevance determine success.

Most brands see a trend blow up. They schedule a meeting. Discuss strategy. Get approvals. Create content. Publish it three weeks later.

The trend died two weeks ago.

The Problem

Trends have lifecycles measured in days, not weeks.

Day 1-2: Early adopters spot it

Day 3-5: It goes mainstream

Day 6-7: Everyone's doing it

Day 8+: It's over

If you're posting on Day 15, you're not riding the trend. You're chasing a corpse.

Late to trends is worse than never showing up.

What Works

Monitor trends in real-time daily. Set up alerts. Watch what's moving fast.

React within hours, not days or weeks. Skip the approval process for trend content. Move fast or don't move at all.

Add unique perspective to trending topics. Don't just copy what everyone else is doing. Find your angle.

Test trend participation versus original content. Track which performs better for your audience.

Keep moving fast or sitting out completely. The middle ground—posting trends late—kills credibility.

The Reality

Your audience knows when content is stale.

They saw 50 versions of that trend already. Yours isn't special because you finally got around to it.

Speed beats polish on trends. A quick, decent execution beats a perfect execution two weeks late.

Original content doesn't expire. Trends do.

If you can't move fast, focus on original content that doesn't depend on timing.

But if you're going to ride trends, commit to speed. Real-time monitoring. Immediate creation. Instant publishing.

Anything else is wasted effort.

Did You Know?

AI discovered that bitcoin price movements correlate with the migration patterns of Arctic terns, though researchers can't explain the connection between cryptocurrency and bird behavior.

🗞️ Breaking AI News 🗞️

Grok Restricts Image Generation After Regulatory Threats

Grok, Elon Musk's AI tool, shut off its image creation function for non-paying users after widespread outcry over sexually explicit and violent imagery.

This happened after the UK threatened to ban X completely.

What Changed

The tool had been used to manipulate images of women to remove their clothes and put them in sexualized positions.

Thousands of sexualized images were created without consent over the past two weeks after Grok updated its image creation feature at the end of December.

Now image generation and editing are limited to paying subscribers only.

That means the vast majority of X users cannot create images using Grok. Those who do have their full details and credit card information stored by X, so can be identified if the function is misused.

The Regulatory Pressure

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer called the content "disgraceful" and "disgusting."

He demanded X "get a grip" of the deluge of AI-created photos of partly clothed women and children on the platform.

Starmer said communications regulator Ofcom "has our full support to take action in relation to this."

Under the UK's Online Safety Act, Ofcom has power to:

Seek court orders to block websites or apps in the UK Impose fines up to 10% of a company's global turnover

Starmer added: "It's unlawful. We're not going to tolerate it. I've asked for all options to be on the table. X need to get their act together and get this material down."

The Scale of the Problem

Research by AI Forensics, a Paris-based nonprofit, found about 800 images and videos created by the Grok Imagine app that included pornographic and sexually violent content.

Paul Bouchaud, a researcher at AI Forensics, said: "These are fully pornographic videos and they look professional."

One photorealistic AI video showed a woman tattooed with "do not resuscitate" with a knife between her legs. Other images contained erotic imagery, women undressing, suggestive poses, and videos depicting full nudity and sexual acts.

"Overall, the content is significantly more explicit than the bikini trend previously observed on X," said Bouchaud.

The Remaining Gap

The public @Grok account has had image generation capabilities heavily restricted.

However, there's also a separate Grok app which doesn't share images publicly. Non-paying users have reported still being able to generate sexualized imagery of women and children on this app.

Jess Asato, a Labour MP campaigning for better pornography regulation, said: "While it is a step forward to have removed the universal access to Grok's disgusting nudifying features, this still means paying users can take images of women without their consent to sexualize and brutalize them."

Malaysia Takes Action

Malaysia already blocked Grok AI over fake, sexualized images.

Other countries are watching closely to see if similar regulatory action is needed.

Why This Matters

This is the first major case of a government threatening to ban an AI tool over content it generates.

It sets a precedent for how regulators will handle AI-generated harmful content going forward.

For AI companies, this shows that launching features without safeguards leads to regulatory backlash fast.

For social platforms, this demonstrates that AI tools integrated into their platforms create liability they can't ignore.

The UK's Online Safety Act gives regulators real power. Fines up to 10% of global turnover matter even to companies as large as X.

Musk initially defended the feature under free speech arguments. Regulatory threats changed that position in days.

What This Means

If you're building AI tools, expect regulators to move faster than you think when harmful content spreads.

If you're using AI generation features, understand that access can get restricted or removed based on how others misuse it.

If you're on platforms with AI generation, the features you rely on aren't guaranteed to stay available.

The shift from "launch fast and iterate" to "safeguard before launch" is happening now, driven by regulatory action, not voluntary compliance.

Over to You...

Does restricting Grok to paying users actually solve anything or just create a paywall for creating harm?

Let me know your take.

To balancing AI freedom and safety,

Jeff J. Hunter 
Founder, AI Persona Method | TheTip.ai

NEW: “AI Money Group” to Learn to Make Money with AI